Saturday, May 31, 2014

Proposed $40 million settlement set for players



A $40 million settlement has been completed that will pay college football and basketball players dating to 2003 for the use of their likenesses in NCAA-branded videogames.


The payouts could go to more than 100,000 athletes, including some current players, who were either on college rosters or had their images used in videogames made by Electronic Arts featuring college teams. Lawyers for the plaintiffs say it would be the first time college athletes will be paid for the commercial use of their images.


Depending on how many athletes apply for the settlement, the payments could range from as little as $48 for each year an athlete was on a roster to $951 for each year the image of an athlete was used in a videogame.


“We’re incredibly pleased with the results of this settlement and the opportunity to right a huge wrong enacted by the NCAA and EA against these players and their rights of publicity,” said Steve Berman, one of the lead attorneys in the case. “We’ve fought against intense legal hurdles since filing this case in 2009 and to see this case come to fruition is a certain victory.”


The settlement is with Electronic Arts and Collegiate Licensing Co., which licenses and markets college sports, and does not include the NCAA. The case against the NCAA is scheduled for trial early next year.


Plaintiffs in the case, which dates to 2009, contend the NCAA conspired with Electronic Arts and Collegiate Licensing Co. to illegally use their images in videogames.


U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken still must approve the proposed settlement, which comes on the eve of a major antitrust trial against the NCAA that could reshape the way college sports operate. That case, featuring former UCLA basketball star Ed O’Bannon and others as lead plaintiffs, goes to trial June 9 in Oakland, California.


According to documents filed with the court late Friday, attorneys for O’Bannon and 20 other plaintiffs say they have already run up legal fees exceeding $30 million and expenses of more than $4 million in pressing their case. They are seeking an injunction that would stop the NCAA from enforcing rules that prohibit athletes from profiting from their play in college.


O’Bannon, who led UCLA to a national title in 1995, is also part of the group settling with EA Sports and Collegiate Licensing Co. Also covered by the settlement are suits brought by former Arizona State quarterback Sam Keller, former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston and former Rutgers player Ryan Hart.


According to the filing, a pool of money will be available to players after attorneys take 33 percent of the proposed settlement and up to $2.5 million in expenses. Named plaintiffs like O’Bannon and Keller will receive $15,000, while others who joined the suit later would get $2,500 or $5,000.


The majority of the money, however, will go to athletes who file for claims, a group that attorneys say could contain between 140,000 and 200,000 players who were on football and basketball rosters from 2003 on. The final payouts will depend on how many of those athletes file claims in the class-action case.


EA Sports announced last year it would stop making the long-running NCAA football videogame series because of the litigation and other issues in securing licensing rights.





Proposed $40 million settlement set for players

PM 'in quit warning over Juncker'



David Cameron has reportedly warned that Britain could leave the EU if Luxembourg ex-prime minister Jean-Claude Juncker becomes the next president of the European Commission.


German news magazine Der Spiegel claims the Prime Minister issued the warning to German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the EU leaders summit in Brussels on Tuesday.


Quoting sources close to those at the summit, the magazine said Mr Cameron fears the appointment of continuity candidate Mr Juncker would destabilise the UK Government to such an extent that it would bring forward an in-out EU referendum.


Mr Cameron reportedly added: “A figure from the Eighties cannot resolve the problems of the next five years.”


A Downing Street spokesman said: “We are not commenting on this. It was a private meeting, a private conversation.”


Mr Cameron has previously made it clear he views the former Luxembourg leader as a symbol of Europe’s past and has argued that a reformer should take charge of the EU executive to pave the way for change.


However, on Friday Ms Merkel gave her backing to Mr Juncker for the key post, putting her and the Prime Minister on a collision course.


Both Mrs Merkel and Mr Juncker’s parties are members of the European People’s party (EPP) bloc, which still dominates the parliament and has selected him as its preferred candidate.


It comes as Iain Duncan Smith said Mr Cameron knows he must deliver “significant return of powers” from the EU to win the support of Tory colleagues in a referendum on British membership.


The Work and Pensions Secretary said the PM was clear he could not “come back with nothing” from a mooted renegotiation after the general election.


He also lashed out at the BBC for failing to give enough prominence to Mr Cameron’s promise of an in-out vote in 2017.


Although Mr Duncan Smith stressed he was “happy” with the premier’s stance, the comments will heap pressure on Mr Cameron to flesh out his ambitions for repatriating powers from Brussels.


Speaking to the Sunday Telegraph, Mr Duncan Smith said: “I think you will find that the Prime Minister in due course will be a little clearer about some of the stuff that he thinks.


“The key thing is he knows very well that he can’t come back with nothing.


“I don’t think the Prime Minister in any way is lost on that fact that he will need to get back some substantial and significant return of powers. It is for him to deliver that.”


Mr Duncan Smith called for new rules to limit migration from the EU, and said Brussels should be stripped of control over who is entitled to state benefits in Britain.


He said he challenged Mr Cameron face-to-face to confirm his commitment to delivering a referendum after the next election.


“I have looked him in the eye and I have asked him the simple question: you are absolutely clear this referendum is going to happen if the Conservatives are back in power and he said ‘Yeah, I won’t be in a government if they won’t have a referendum.’”


Speaking on the by-election campaign trail in Newark, he signalled that if Mr Cameron failed to get a good deal, he would be ready to vote to leave the EU as Britain could “prosper” outside the union.


“Let’s have that referendum and when the Prime Minister goes and does his negotiations, if I am lucky enough to be in government at the time, I will do my level best to help him and support him.


“When he comes back I will make a decision on that like everybody else in Britain will do.”


Mr Duncan Smith attacked the national broadcaster for failing to cover Tory policies properly.


He warned that “most people” do not even know about the Conservatives’ pledge to hold an in-out referendum on EU membership.


“The BBC has spent their whole time downgrading this whole pledge,” the Cabinet minister said.


The broadcaster’s executives take the view that “we’ve done that” and the policy does not need explaining, he said. “They don’t do the British people a service at all.


“The British people use the BBC more than anything else to find out what’s going on in politics. When was the last time you really heard this?”


Mr Duncan Smith said public ignorance of the referendum plan was “the challenge to us over the next months to the election”.


However, he argued Ukip’s strong showing in local and European elections on May 22 was simply a “protest” which would fade away by polling day next year.


The former Tory leader also insisted the party had shown “some significant discipline when compared with the other two parties” in the wake of the results.


“I was leader once upon a time, when frankly you couldn’t hold a raffle in this bloody party but you would have 50% of them against and 50% of them for,” he said. “So for the Conservatives to show discipline is significant.”


A BBC spokeswoman said: “The BBC has given the Conservative Party’s policy on an in-out referendum on Europe extensive coverage from the moment the pledge was made, and ever since.


“We are satisfied that we have covered the EU referendum promise impartially and accurately.”


Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander sought to turn up the heat on Mr Cameron by demanding he spell out his negotiation aims.


In a letter to the PM, Mr Alexander wrote: “It is now 16 months since your Bloomberg speech about the future of Europe where you described five key principles that you said should underpin the way Europe should change: competitiveness, flexibility, power flowing back to nation states, accountability and fairness.


“At the time, there was widespread agreement in the UK that, while abstract, these five principles were indeed important ideals.


“Since then, despite repeated requests from leading members of the British business community, from within your own party and from MPs from all sides, you have failed to set out your specific reform agenda for the EU.


“The concern over your silence is widely held. Only this week, dozens of Conservative activists, MPs and senior figures from the grassroots of your party, called on you to urgently offer ‘clarity’ on your European reform agenda which, they point out, you have conspicuously not done to date.”




Source Article from https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pm-quit-warning-over-juncker-040121819.html



PM 'in quit warning over Juncker'

How Obama's power plant emission rules will work



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration on Monday plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.


The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.


Obama says the rules are essential to curb the heat-trapping greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. Critics contend the rules will kill jobs, drive up electricity prices and shutter plants across the country.


Environmentalists and industry advocates alike are eagerly awaiting the specifics, which the Environmental Protection Agency will make public for the first time on Monday and Obama will champion from the White House.


While the details remain murky, the administration says the rules will play a major role in achieving the pledge Obama made in Copenhagen during his first year in office to cut America’s carbon emissions by about 17 percent by 2020.


Some questions and answers about the proposal:


___


Q: How does the government plan to limit emissions?


A: Unable to persuade Congress to act on climate change, Obama is turning to the Clean Air Act. The 1970s-era law has long been used to regulate pollutants like soot, mercury and lead but has only recently been applied to greenhouse gases.


Unlike with new power plants, the government can’t regulate existing plant emissions directly. Instead, the government will issue guidelines for cutting emissions, then each state will develop its own plan to meet those guidelines. If a state refuses, the EPA can create its own plan.


___


Q: Why are these rules necessary?


A: Power plants are the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Environmentalists and the White House say without bold action, climate change will intensify and endanger the public’s well-being around the world. In its National Climate Assessment this year, the administration said warming and erratic weather will become increasingly disruptive unless curtailed.


“This is not some distant problem of the future. This is a problem that is affecting Americans right now,” Obama said in May.


The United States is only one player in the global climate game. These rules won’t touch carbon emissions in other nations whose coal plants are even dirtier. But the White House believes that leading by example gives the U.S. more leverage to pressure other countries to reduce their own emissions.


___


Q: How steep will the reductions be?


A: We don’t know.


The administration hasn’t said whether it will set one universal standard or apply different standards in each state. But Obama’s senior counselor, John Podesta, said the reductions will be made “in the most cost-effective and most efficient way possible,” by giving flexibility to the states.


That could include offsetting emissions by increasing the use of solar and nuclear power, switching to cleaner-burning fuels like natural gas or creating efficiency programs that reduce energy demand. States might also pursue an emissions-trading plan — also known as cap-and-trade — as several northeast states have already done.


___


Q: How will they affect my power bill? What about the economy?


A: It depends where you live. Different states have a different mixes of coal versus gas and other fuels, so the rules will affect some states more than others. Dozens of coal-burning plants have already announced they plan to close.


Still, it’s a good bet the rules will drive up electricity prices. The U.S. relies on coal for 40 percent of its electricity, and the Energy Department predicts retail power prices will rise this year because of environmental regulations, economic forces and other factors.


Environmentalists argue that some of those costs are offset by decreased health care costs and other indirect benefits. They also say the transition toward greener fuels could create jobs.


___


Q: Doesn’t Obama need approval from Congress?


A: Not for this. A 2007 Supreme Court ruling gave the EPA the green light to regulate carbon-dioxide under the Clean Air Act. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be fierce opposition and drawn-out litigation. The government is expecting legal challenges and is preparing to defend the rules in court if necessary.


___


Q: Is this the final step?


A: Not even close. After the draft rule is proposed, there’s a full year for public comment and revisions. Then states have another year to submit their implementation plans to the EPA.


___


Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.


___


Reach Josh Lederman at https://twitter.com/joshledermanAP





How Obama's power plant emission rules will work

In China, managers are the new labour activists



By Alexandra Harney and John Ruwitch


SHANGHAI (Reuters) – Behind China‘s biggest strike in decades last month was a new player in Chinese labour activism: management.


A previously unpublished account from inside the strike at Taiwanese shoe manufacturer Yue Yuen obtained by Reuters shows that supervisors were the first to challenge senior plant leaders about the social insurance contributions that became the focus of the dispute. Yue Yuen Industrial Holdings declined to comment.


The involvement of managers underscores the growing complexity and unpredictability of labour relations in China. A generation of long-serving migrant factory employees is starting to retire just as the economy slows and the spread of social media makes strikes easier to organise.


Yue Yuen’s strike wasn’t the first time in recent years managers, rather than front-line workers, helped orchestrate industrial action in China. Managers were also involved in leading a strike at IBM’s facility in Shenzhen in March, according to a worker and another person briefed on the strike. IBM declined to comment.


Supervisors and other low- and mid-level managers also helped corral workers during a March strike at Shanmukang Technology, which supplies mobile phone cases to Samsung Electronics, a former employee said.


Managers have been orchestrating strikes during international deals for years, lawyers said. “It happens all the time” that managers encourage workers to strike during an international transaction that affects a company’s Chinese operations, said Jonathan Isaacs, special counsel with responsibility for Chinese employment and labour issues at law firm Baker & McKenzie in Hong Kong.


In many cases “the reason an M&A transaction, layoffs or restructuring goes sideways or causes labour unrest is that the local management were disgruntled and riled up the rank-and-file workers”, he added.


In November 2011, mid-level managers led thousands of PepsiCo Inc workers to strike in protest against the terms of the company’s acquisition by Tingyi Holdings, according to Hong Kong-based worker advocacy group China Labour Bulletin (CLB).


However, some of the largest recent strikes, including the Yue Yuen action, don’t involve a factory sale or restructuring.


Labour unrest has surged in China in recent months as slowing economic growth and rising costs have squeezed companies in industrialized areas like the Pearl River Delta in southern Guangdong province. CLB has recorded 319 strikes and labour protests since the beginning of the year.


MORE ACTIVE ROLE


Chinese factory disputes typically start with younger employees pushing management for higher pay. But in the last few years, as restructurings have become more common, managers have begun to take a more active role in negotiations and work stoppages because they have more at stake, lawyers said.


China’s 2008 labour contract law requires companies terminating employees to pay compensation worth one month’s salary for every year of employment. The longer an employee has been working at a factory, the greater the potential payoff from a closure, merger or restructuring.


Turnover at Chinese factories is high – reaching 100 percent a year in some companies. Younger workers spin through jobs quickly, sometimes staying only months in one plant. Managers can be among a plant’s longest serving employees.


“Strikes started by older workers often come about because of a change in the company, when a company is being merged or restructured,” says Dong Baohua, professor at the East China University of Politics and Law. “Older workers want to cash in on their years of service.”


Line managers may have information about organizational changes before rank-and-file workers. And they may use the threat of a work stoppage to motivate corporate leaders to improve managers’ pay or compensation, lawyers said.


Managers “are better at motivating and organising others,” says Guangdong Labour Institute Deputy Secretary-General Yang Zhengxi, who noted that his observations were based on field research in a Sanyo electronics plant in Shenzhen in 2011. “But managers will always stay off the front lines in strikes, always be in a mobilizing role.”


SPREADING THE WORD


According to the account compiled by a labour group, a supervisor first raised a complaint about the social contributions issue in late March, a few weeks before the strike began. The supervisor and colleagues spread word among workers, who then went to look up their social insurance contributions. The labour group requested anonymity to protect its relationship with Yue Yuen staff.


A Yue Yuen worker who would only give his name as Wang said low-level managers were involved in pressuring workers to return to work once the company agreed to their demands. The company told them they would go bankrupt if the workers did not compel the workers to go back to work, he said.


During the IBM strike, after a chaotic first day, line managers began to organise the workers, according to a worker who asked not to be identified.


Wu Xingcan, 28, worked on and off at South Korean-owned Shanmukang Technology between 2012 and last month. The March strike was triggered when the factory requested that workers contribute more to the social insurance fund in line with Chinese law, Wu said. After the strike began, group leaders and supervisors privately encouraged workers to stay off the production line. Shanmukang could not be reached for comment.


“The longer these people have worked in factories, the greater their interest in social insurance, and the more likely they are to incite other workers and participate in strikes themselves,” said Pun Ngai, sociology professor in the applied social science department at Hong Kong Polytechnic University.


China has some 40 million migrant workers aged over 50 – about 15 percent of the country’s 262 million migrant workers, according to the National Bureau of Statistics.


At Yue Yuen, the common belief among roughly two dozen employees with whom Reuters spoke during the strike was that the social insurance problem came to light when a newly-retired employee went to collect her retirement benefit earlier this year. One worker told Reuters this retiree was Chen Yuchi, a senior employee who left the factory last year and is now living in central Hubei province.


In 1989, aged 26, Chen moved to Gaobu where the newly-founded Yue Yuen had just built its sneaker factory. She took a job, and in April 2013, after 24 years at the factory, retired as a manager. In August, after turning 50, she went to the social insurance office to collect her retirement benefit.


“It was only a little more than 600 yuan (£57). I thought, it’s so low. Nobody explained why,” she told Reuters by telephone last month.


Shocked, she returned to the managers’ dormitory and told former colleagues there. When Reuters reached Chen this week, she declined to discuss the issue further.


(Additional reporting by Shanghai newsroom)





In China, managers are the new labour activists

Singer Ray J arrested at Beverly Hills hotel



BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. (AP) — Police arrested singer Ray J at a Beverly Hills hotel after they say he became belligerent with staff, kicked out a patrol car window and spit at an officer.


A statement from the Beverly Hills Police Department says officers came to the hotel Friday evening to investigate a report that the 33-year-old singer had inappropriately touched a woman at the bar.


Officers found the contact was incidental, and the singer agreed to leave.


But police say Ray J, whose legal name is William Ray Norwood, then refused to leave, became unruly and used his feet to shatter a patrol car window after being taken into custody.


A representative for Ray J declined to comment about the arrest.


The charges include vandalism, resisting arrest and battery on a police officer.


Ray J is the brother of singer-actress Brandy Norwood.





Singer Ray J arrested at Beverly Hills hotel

Paper Aeroplane's Amazing Flight At Wembley



A video which shows the moment a paper aeroplane strikes a player on the pitch during the England football team’s win over Peru has gone viral on YouTube.



The video shows an England fan tossing the paper plane from high in the stands at Wembley on Friday.



Fans cheer as they follow the plane’s flight, watching it sail over the spectators below and out across the pitch.



It finally comes to rest after it strikes a Peru player, to the delight of the spectators.



The video has been watched by more than 980,000 people online.



England won the match 3-0.




Source Article from https://uk.news.yahoo.com/paper-aeroplanes-amazing-flight-wembley-002440359.html



Paper Aeroplane's Amazing Flight At Wembley

How Obama's power plant emission rules will work



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration on Monday plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.


The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.


Obama says the rules are essential to curb the heat-trapping greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. Critics contend the rules will kill jobs, drive up electricity prices and shutter plants across the country.


Environmentalists and industry advocates alike are eagerly awaiting the specifics, which the Environmental Protection Agency will make public for the first time on Monday and Obama will champion from the White House.


While the details remain murky, the administration says the rules will play a major role in achieving the pledge Obama made in Copenhagen during his first year in office to cut America’s carbon emissions by about 17 percent by 2020.


Some questions and answers about the proposal:


___


Q: How does the government plan to limit emissions?


A: Unable to persuade Congress to act on climate change, Obama is turning to the Clean Air Act. The 1970s-era law has long been used to regulate pollutants like soot, mercury and lead but has only recently been applied to greenhouse gases.


Unlike with new power plants, the government can’t regulate existing plant emissions directly. Instead, the government will issue guidelines for cutting emissions, then each state will develop its own plan to meet those guidelines. If a state refuses, the EPA can create its own plan.


___


Q: Why are these rules necessary?


A: Power plants are the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Environmentalists and the White House say without bold action, climate change will intensify and endanger the public’s well-being around the world. In its National Climate Assessment this year, the administration said warming and erratic weather will become increasingly disruptive unless curtailed.


“This is not some distant problem of the future. This is a problem that is affecting Americans right now,” Obama said in May.


The United States is only one player in the global climate game. These rules won’t touch carbon emissions in other nations whose coal plants are even dirtier. But the White House believes that leading by example gives the U.S. more leverage to pressure other countries to reduce their own emissions.


___


Q: How steep will the reductions be?


A: We don’t know.


The administration hasn’t said whether it will set one universal standard or apply different standards in each state. But Obama’s senior counselor, John Podesta, said the reductions will be made “in the most cost-effective and most efficient way possible,” by giving flexibility to the states.


That could include offsetting emissions by increasing the use of solar and nuclear power, switching to cleaner-burning fuels like natural gas or creating efficiency programs that reduce energy demand. States might also pursue an emissions-trading plan — also known as cap-and-trade — as several northeast states have already done.


___


Q: How will they affect my power bill? What about the economy?


A: It depends where you live. Different states have a different mixes of coal versus gas and other fuels, so the rules will affect some states more than others. Dozens of coal-burning plants have already announced they plan to close.


Still, it’s a good bet the rules will drive up electricity prices. The U.S. relies on coal for 40 percent of its electricity, and the Energy Department predicts retail power prices will rise this year because of environmental regulations, economic forces and other factors.


Environmentalists argue that some of those costs are offset by decreased health care costs and other indirect benefits. They also say the transition toward greener fuels could create jobs.


___


Q: Doesn’t Obama need approval from Congress?


A: Not for this. A 2007 Supreme Court ruling gave the EPA the green light to regulate carbon-dioxide under the Clean Air Act. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be fierce opposition and drawn-out litigation. The government is expecting legal challenges and is preparing to defend the rules in court if necessary.


___


Q: Is this the final step?


A: Not even close. After the draft rule is proposed, there’s a full year for public comment and revisions. Then states have another year to submit their implementation plans to the EPA.


___


Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.


___


Reach Josh Lederman at https://twitter.com/joshledermanAP





How Obama's power plant emission rules will work

Warnings on 'gaming' patient waits go back years



WASHINGTON (AP) — The report this week confirming that 1,700 veterans were “at risk of being lost or forgotten” at a Phoenix hospital was hardly the first independent review that documented long wait times for some patients seeking health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs and inaccurate records that understated the depth of the problem.


Eleven years ago, a task force established by President George W. Bush determined that at least 236,000 veterans were waiting six months or more for a first appointment or an initial follow-up. The task force warned that more veterans were expected to enter the system and that the delays threatened the quality of care the VA provided.


Two years ago, a former hospital administrator told senators during an oversight hearing that VA hospitals were “gaming the system” and manipulating records to make it appear that wait time standards, the criteria for awarding manager and executive bonuses, were being met.


Since 2005, the department’s inspector general has issued 19 reports on how long veterans have to wait before getting appointments and treatment at VA medical facilities, concluding that for many, sufficient controls don’t exist to ensure that those needing care get it.


For example, in October 2007, the VA inspector general told the Senate Committee on Aging that “schedulers at some facilities were interpreting the guidance from their managers to reduce waiting times as instruction to never put patients on the electronic waiting list. This seems to have resulted in some ‘gaming’ of the scheduling process.”


That’s virtually identical to language in a 2010 VA memorandum, and again in the latest inspector general’s report this week that led dozens of members of Congress to call for VA Secretary Eric Shinseki to resign. He abided by those wishes Friday, telling Obama that he had become a distraction as the administration tried to address the VA’s troubles.


The series of reports over the years also raises questions about whether Congress should have done more to solve the problems that have so grabbed the nation’s attention in recent weeks.


“Anyone in Congress who thinks they’ve done enough for the VA is simply deluding themselves,” Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia said in response to Shinseki’s resignation. “Year after year, when members of Congress have had the opportunity to provide legitimate funding increases for the VA, they’ve done just enough to skirt by.”


Pointing to the Bush task force report from 2003, Joseph Violante, legislative director for Disabled American Veterans, said the problem of access to health care has been known for a decade.


“In our mind, a lot of the problem that is taking place on the health care side is due to a lack of sufficient funding, and that’s Congress’s jurisdiction. We think they’ve fallen short over the years,” Violante said.


Rep. Jeff Miller, the chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, said money is not the problem at the VA. He notes that the president has traveled the country touting the spending increases that have occurred in VA’s budget during his presidency.


Spending for VA medical care has nearly doubled in less than a decade, from $28.8 billion in 2006 to $56 billion last year.


“They can’t even spend the money that we appropriated to them. If money could have solved this problem, it would have been solved a long time ago,” Miller said. “It is manipulation and mismanagement that has created the crisis that exists today.”


Miller, who became chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs in 2011, makes the case that the investigations that have been undertaken by the VA’s inspector general and the Government Accountability Office were generally conducted at the request of members of Congress. When he has sought to follow up about whether the VA was meeting investigators’ recommendations, Miller said he has been stonewalled.


The committee has had an acrimonious relationship with VA leadership and even developed a section on its website called “Trials in Transparency” that list some of the more than 100 requests for information made by the committee that it says are still outstanding.


The problems in Phoenix, Miller said, came to light because of his committee’s work with a whistleblower that VA would not pay attention to, Dr. Samuel Foote, who retired after spending nearly 25 years with the department.


Foote said up to 40 veterans may have died while awaiting treatment at the Phoenix hospital and that staff, at the instruction of administrators, kept a secret list of patients waiting for appointments to hide delays in care. He believes administrators kept the off-the-books list to impress their bosses and get bonuses. The IG said that while its work was not complete, it had substantiated significant delays in access that negatively impacted the quality of care at the Phoenix hospital. The IG has not substantiated whether any veterans in Phoenix died due to a delay in treatment.


But it’s clear that media reports citing a specific number of 40 veteran deaths gave a human element to the story that triggered greater urgency from the public, veterans groups and lawmakers. In a matter of weeks the American Legion went from being a strong supporter of Shinseki to asking for his resignation.


“For some reason, something triggered the media’s appetite for this story when we’ve been asking VA to participate and give us information. I don’t know if it was the number of 40 veterans,” Miller said.


As he gave his final speech as VA secretary, Shinseki acknowledged that he once viewed the department’s problems concerning wait times as limited.


“I no longer believe it. It is systemic. I was too trusting of some, and I accepted, as accurate, reports that I now know to have been misleading with regard to patient wait times,” he said.





Warnings on 'gaming' patient waits go back years

UK's anti-EU voters to stick with UKIP party in national election - poll



LONDON (Reuters) – Nearly nine in 10 of the over four million Britons who backed the anti-EU UKIP party in this month’s European elections will vote for them again in national polls next year, potentially costing Prime Minister David Cameron vital votes, according to a survey on Saturday.


If that were to happen, it would break the previous trend of support for UKIP in EU ballots disappearing at parliamentary elections.


UKIP, which calls for Britain to leave the European Union, won 4.3 million votes and topped the vote last week, scoring a 27.5 percent share, ahead of the main opposition Labour Party and ruling Conservatives.


However, in the 2009 European elections, the party took 16.5 percent of the vote before falling to just 3 percent a year later in a general election, failing to win a single seat in parliament.


Britons are expected to elect a new government by May 2015, with Cameron – currently at the head of a coalition with the junior Liberal Democrat party – promising to renegotiate Britain’s EU membership terms and hold an in/out referendum within two years, if his party achieves an overall majority.


Saturday’s ComRes poll, however, suggests that his chances of winning the 2015 election could be harmed, with over 3 million voters intending to stick with UKIP.


The poll found that the largest share of those who backed UKIP and its leader Nigel Farage had supported the Conservatives in the 2010 general election.


Just under 40 percent of those who voted for UKIP last week said they were “certain” to back the party next year and another 49 percent said they were “likely” to do so, according to the poll funded by UKIP donor Paul Sykes and published in the centre-right Telegraph newspaper.


That may not necessarily bring UKIP its first paliamentary seat however.


European polls use a system based on proportional representation, whereas parliamentary elections are decided by a first-past-the-post system seen as favouring the larger established parties.


UKIP is hoping to win its first Member of Parliament (MP) at a single-seat election on Thursday in the central England constituency of Newark, currently held by the Conservatives with a large majority.


ComRes interviewed 4,078 adults between May 23 and 26 for the poll.


(Reporting By Costas Pitas; editing by Stephen Addison)





UK's anti-EU voters to stick with UKIP party in national election - poll

U.S. soldier freed in Afghanistan, 5 Taliban prisoners leave Guantanamo



By Warren Strobel


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The last U.S. prisoner of war from America’s waning Afghan war was handed over to U.S. Special Operations forces in Afghanistan on Saturday in a dramatic swap for five Taliban detainees who were released from Guantanamo Bay prison and flown to Qatar.


Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl had been held for nearly five years by Afghan militants and his release followed years of on-and-off negotiations.


President Barack Obama hailed the release in a brief appearance with Bergdahl’s parents, Bob and Jani, in the White House Rose Garden, saying that “while Bowe was gone, he was never forgotten.”


Bergdahl was on his way to an American military hospital in Germany, a U.S. defense official said.


U.S. special forces took custody of Bergdahl in a non-violent exchange with 18 Taliban members in eastern Afghanistan, senior U.S. officials said, adding that he was believed to be in good condition. Before leaving for Germany, he received medical care at Bagram Air Base, the main U.S. base in Afghanistan.


Bergdahl, 28, was handed over about 6 p.m. local time on Saturday, a senior official said. The U.S. forces, who had flown in by helicopter, were on the ground very briefly, said the officials, who would not specify the precise location of the handover.


A U.S. defense official said Bergdahl was able to walk and became emotional on his way to freedom. “Once he was on the helicopter, he wrote on a paper plate, ‘SF?’” the official said, referring to the abbreviation for special forces. “The operators replied loudly: ‘Yes, we’ve been looking for you for a long time.’ And at this point, Sergeant Bergdahl broke down.”


Hours later, a second U.S. defense official said the five Taliban detainees, now formally in Qatari custody, had departed the Guantanamo prison for foreign terrorism suspects. They were aboard a U.S. military C-17 aircraft and en route to the Gulf emirate.


Bergdahl, who is from Idaho, was the only known missing U.S. soldier in the Afghan war that was launched soon after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States to dislodge the Taliban – accused of sheltering al Qaeda militants – from power.


He was captured under unknown circumstances in eastern Afghanistan by militants on June 30, 2009, about two months after arriving in the country.


TOUGH RECOVERY PROCESS


His recovery after long years in captivity could be difficult. At the White House, Bergdahl’s father began his words speaking a Muslim prayer and said his son was having difficulty speaking English. He asked for patience from the media as the family helped him readjust.


A U.S. defense official said Bergdahl would continue treatment at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, including the start of his “reintegration process.”


“That includes time for him to tell his story, decompress, and to reconnect with his family through telephone calls and video conferences,” the official said.


Bergdahl’s release could be a national security boost for Obama, whose foreign policy has been widely criticized in recent months. But some members of Congress have worried in the past over the potential release of the five Taliban detainees, particularly Mohammed Fazl, a “high-risk” detainee held at Guantanamo since early 2002. Fazl is alleged to be responsible for the killing of thousands of Afghanistan’s minority Shi’ite Muslims between 1998 and 2001.


A U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, identified the five men as Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Mohammed Nabi, Khairullah Khairkhwa and Abdul Haq Wasiq. Pentagon documents released by the WikiLeaks organization said all five were sent to Guantanamo in 2002, the year the detention facility opened. They were classified as “high-risk” detainees “likely to pose a threat” to the United States, its interests and allies.


While welcoming Bergdahl’s release, Representative Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, said: “I am extremely troubled, however, that the United States negotiated with terrorists and agreed to swap five senior Taliban leaders who are responsible for the deaths of many Americans.”


U.S. officials referred to the release of the Taliban detainees as a transfer and noted they would be subject to certain restrictions in Qatar. One of the officials said that would include a minimum one-year ban on them traveling outside of Qatar as well as monitoring of their activities.


Rogers said he had “little confidence” in such assurances.


Under U.S. law, the Obama administration is supposed to notify Congress 30 days in advance of the transfer of any detainee from Guantanamo. In this case, a U.S. official said such notification was made on Saturday after Bergdahl was in U.S. custody – a move that angered some lawmakers.


Howard McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and James Inhofe, senior Republican member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Obama “clearly violated laws” requiring him to give 30 days’ notification.


But a senior U.S. official said the administration had seized on a chance to save Bergdahl. “The administration determined that given these unique and exigent circumstances, such a transfer should go forward notwithstanding the notice requirement,” the official said.


Bergdahl’s freedom followed a renewed round of indirect U.S.-Taliban talks in recent months, with Qatar acting as intermediary, the officials said. It also came just days after another step in the winding down of the war.


Obama announced this week he would keep 9,800 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, mostly to train Afghan forces, after NATO combat operations end at the end of 2014. The last soldiers, aside from a small presence at U.S. diplomatic posts, will leave at the end of 2016.


FAMILY, HOMETOWN CELEBRATEThe Bergdahl family was in Washington, D.C., when informed by Obama of the release. The parents said in a statement they were “joyful and relieved,” adding: “We cannot wait to wrap our arms around our only son.” Bergdahl’s hometown of Hailey, Idaho, also began celebrating. “Once we heard about it. We were pretty  excited,” said 17-year-old Real Weatherly, who was making signs on Saturday and blowing up balloons to hang outside the shop where she works.


The Afghan Taliban confirmed on Saturday it had freed Bergdahl. “This is true. After several rounds of talks for prisoners’ swap, we freed US soldier and our dear guest in exchange of five commanders held in Guantanamo Bay since 2002,” a senior Taliban commander said. The Taliban commander said Bergdahl had mostly been held in the tribal areas between Pakistan and Afghanistan after what he termed his “dramatic” kidnapping from Afghanistan’s Paktika province in June 2009. Reuters first reported the potential deal involving the five Taliban detainees in December 2011.


A second senior U.S. official said the negotiations for Bergdahl’s release revived last November when the Taliban signaled it wanted to resume talks on prisoners. But it was unclear why the Taliban moved now to conclude a deal that Washington had been seeking for years.


While U.S. and Taliban envoys have met directly in the past, there were no direct U.S.-Taliban contacts during the most recent negotiations, U.S. officials said. Messages were passed via Qatari officials.


The final stage of negotiations, which took place in the Qatari capital, Doha, began one week ago, the U.S. officials said. Obama and Qatar’s emir spoke on Tuesday and reaffirmed the security conditions under which the Taliban members would be placed, they said.


(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton, Mark Hosenball, Will Dunham, David Brunnstrom, Elvina Nawaguna and Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Frances Kerry and Peter Cooney)





U.S. soldier freed in Afghanistan, 5 Taliban prisoners leave Guantanamo

Chance The Rapper Throws Out First Pitch, And Nails It



If music doesn’t work out, it looks like Chance The Rapper could have a promising second career in baseball, judging at least from his pro-looking windup and throw right into the catcher’s mitt during Friday’s White Sox game against the San Diego Padres at Chicago’s U.S. Cellular Field.


The MC, who recently dropped an amazing cover of the cartoon theme song for “Arthur,” thankfully didn’t suffer the same fate as 50 Cent, whose errant throw caused Fif to be pulled over by the cops and ridiculed all over the internet.


Chance celebrated the successful pitch with an adorable victory fist-pump move. Check out the clip below.







Chance The Rapper Throws Out First Pitch, And Nails It

Clegg's approval rating tumbles



Nick Clegg has become the least popular party leader in modern British political history, according to a poll.


YouGov research for the Sunday Times found just 13% thought the Deputy Prime Minister was doing a good job – compared to 78% who said the opposite.


The Liberal Democrat’s -65% rating is even worse than Gordon Brown’s -62% at the height of the credit crunch crisis in 2008.


The figures are a remarkable turnaround since the 2010 general election, when Mr Clegg had 74% approval and was hailed as the most popular leader since Churchill.


The Lib Dems descended into bitter infighting in the wake of disastrous local and European election results, with Business Secretary Vince Cable forced to deny he was part of a plot to oust the leader.


The newspaper reported that Lib Dem activists have now begun no-confidence proceedings against Mr Clegg in 190 local associations. They need to be successful in 75 to trigger a leadership contest.




Source Article from https://uk.news.yahoo.com/cleggs-approval-rating-tumbles-232307291.html



Clegg's approval rating tumbles

Psy's 'Gangnam Style' Reaches Two Billion YouTube Views











<!– –>


<!–

–>

It’s one small step for man, one giant horse-y dance for mankind. K-Pop sensation Psy’s viral smash “Gangnam Style” has become the first video to hit 2 billion views on YouTube. Yup, that means a viewership equivalent to just under one-third of the global population has spent a combined 504 billion seconds — or, 15,971.1 years — watching “Gangnam Style.” We did it!



Find Out Where Psy’s ‘Gangnam Style’ Ranks on Our List of 2012′s Best Songs



“2 billion views; they are very honorable and very burdensome numbers,” Psy said in a statement. “With the appreciation, I will come back soon with more joyful contents!!”



Psy’s “Gangnam Style” entered our collective consciousness back in the halcyon days of 2012, infiltrating every aspect of our culture from Today to a Madonna show at Madison Square Garden to the White House. On the day he was elected to his second term as President of the United States of America, Barack Obama told a New Hampshire radio station, ”I just saw that video for the first time, and I think I can do that move.”



Within four months of its debut, “Gangnam Style” topped Justin Bieber‘s “Baby” as the most watched video on YouTube, and by Christmas 2012 it became the first video to be watched over 1 billion times. Psy announced he would “retire” the song after helping ring in 2013 on Dick Clark’s New Year’s Rockin’ Eve, but the K-Pop sensation wasn’t able to recreate that viral magic with his follow-up single, “Gentleman M/V,” which currently boasts a paltry 687 million views on YouTube.



In honor of the song that will never go away, watch “Gangnam Style” below.






Psy's 'Gangnam Style' Reaches Two Billion YouTube Views

How Obama's power plant emission rules will work



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration on Monday plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.


The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.


Obama says the rules are essential to curb the heat-trapping greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. Critics contend the rules will kill jobs, drive up electricity prices and shutter plants across the country.


Environmentalists and industry advocates alike are eagerly awaiting the specifics, which the Environmental Protection Agency will make public for the first time on Monday and Obama will champion from the White House.


While the details remain murky, the administration says the rules will play a major role in achieving the pledge Obama made in Copenhagen during his first year in office to cut America’s carbon emissions by about 17 percent by 2020.


Some questions and answers about the proposal:


___


Q: How does the government plan to limit emissions?


A: Unable to persuade Congress to act on climate change, Obama is turning to the Clean Air Act. The 1970s-era law has long been used to regulate pollutants like soot, mercury and lead but has only recently been applied to greenhouse gases.


Unlike with new power plants, the government can’t regulate existing plant emissions directly. Instead, the government will issue guidelines for cutting emissions, then each state will develop its own plan to meet those guidelines. If a state refuses, the EPA can create its own plan.


___


Q: Why are these rules necessary?


A: Power plants are the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Environmentalists and the White House say without bold action, climate change will intensify and endanger the public’s well-being around the world. In its National Climate Assessment this year, the administration said warming and erratic weather will become increasingly disruptive unless curtailed.


“This is not some distant problem of the future. This is a problem that is affecting Americans right now,” Obama said in May.


The United States is only one player in the global climate game. These rules won’t touch carbon emissions in other nations whose coal plants are even dirtier. But the White House believes that leading by example gives the U.S. more leverage to pressure other countries to reduce their own emissions.


___


Q: How steep will the reductions be?


A: We don’t know.


The administration hasn’t said whether it will set one universal standard or apply different standards in each state. But Obama’s senior counselor, John Podesta, said the reductions will be made “in the most cost-effective and most efficient way possible,” by giving flexibility to the states.


That could include offsetting emissions by increasing the use of solar and nuclear power, switching to cleaner-burning fuels like natural gas or creating efficiency programs that reduce energy demand. States might also pursue an emissions-trading plan — also known as cap-and-trade — as several northeast states have already done.


___


Q: How will they affect my power bill? What about the economy?


A: It depends where you live. Different states have a different mixes of coal versus gas and other fuels, so the rules will affect some states more than others. Dozens of coal-burning plants have already announced they plan to close.


Still, it’s a good bet the rules will drive up electricity prices. The U.S. relies on coal for 40 percent of its electricity, and the Energy Department predicts retail power prices will rise this year because of environmental regulations, economic forces and other factors.


Environmentalists argue that some of those costs are offset by decreased health care costs and other indirect benefits. They also say the transition toward greener fuels could create jobs.


___


Q: Doesn’t Obama need approval from Congress?


A: Not for this. A 2007 Supreme Court ruling gave the EPA the green light to regulate carbon-dioxide under the Clean Air Act. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be fierce opposition and drawn-out litigation. The government is expecting legal challenges and is preparing to defend the rules in court if necessary.


___


Q: Is this the final step?


A: Not even close. After the draft rule is proposed, there’s a full year for public comment and revisions. Then states have another year to submit their implementation plans to the EPA.


___


Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.


___


Reach Josh Lederman at https://twitter.com/joshledermanAP





How Obama's power plant emission rules will work

Network distances itself from reality casting



NEW YORK (AP) — Producers seeking teenagers who “party like a rock star” for a reality show about their lives say they were actually casting for the upcoming CMT intervention series, “My Dysfunctional Family,” not a show that glorifies teen rebellion.


But the producers and CMT, which is premiering the series on July 5, are distancing themselves from how participants were wrangled for the show.


Through a casting service, the show’s production company had said it was seeking people as young as 13 who described themselves as “a modern-day teenage rebel with a hardcore lifestyle.”


A casting flyer was distributed with the message: “(expletive) parents. They’re old and they don’t know (expletive). It’s 4:20 and time for you and your friend Molly to tell your story.” Molly is the street name for a synthetic drug.


The notice, which appeared in the entertainment industry publication Backstage, advertised a show called “My Teen Life,” which doesn’t exist. Instead, producers now say the casting was for “My Dysfunctional Family,” which features “a self-styled commando family fixer” who helps troubled teens and their families deal with addiction and other issues.


Yet both CMT and the show’s production company, Shed Media US, say they did not see or approve the language in the Backstage notice and flyer for their show. And the casting company, Metal Flowers Media, says it circulated only approved materials, but wouldn’t say who approved them.


The casting language is not in the spirit of the show, CMT said in a statement on Thursday.


“‘My Dysfunctional Family’ is a positive show about bringing families together,” CMT said. “In no way does this show glamorize or even condone bad behavior from teenagers. We hope this show will serve as a conversation starter for families, with common sense advice every family can relate to.”


One casting call that CMT says it did approve is directed to parents of out-of-control teenagers. That notice said producers are looking for parents who are at their wit’s end with families that are falling apart. It directed responses to an email account at Shed.


Kristi Russell, president of Metal Flowers Media, said that while the show doesn’t encourage or accept bad behavior, troubled teens must be found before they can be helped.


“How do you find a troubled teen?” Russell asked. “You outreach to crisis centers, churches, exasperated parents, scared siblings and, most importantly, directly to the teens themselves in a language they relate and respond to.”


“My Dysfunctional Family” stars Dave Vitalli, who has appeared on the syndicated show “Maury” dealing with troubled families. It seems modeled in part after A&E’s popular series “Intervention,” where friends and family members of people with substance abuse problems demand that the person seek help.


Shed has produced several non-fiction series, including “The Real Housewives of New York City” for Bravo, “Basketball Wives” on VH1 and “SuperNanny” on ABC. The Metal Flowers Media website lists more than 100 television programs for which it has helped find participants.


____


David Bauder can be reached at dbauder@ap.org or on Twitter @dbauder. His work can be found at http://bigstory.ap.org/content/david-bauder.





Network distances itself from reality casting

Spain to pass $8.6 billion plan to boost jobs, cut taxes in June - prime minister



MADRID (Reuters) – Spain will approve a 6.3 billion euro (5.14 billion pounds or 8.6 billion dollars) plan next week to create badly needed jobs and will cut the main rate of corporate tax to 25 percent from 30 percent to make companies more competitive, Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy said on Saturday.


About one in four workers in Spain is unemployed, with the jobless rate climbing to over 50 percent for people aged 25 or less. A tentative economic recovery has yet to feed into jobs and better living conditions for most Spaniards.


The tax announcement comes as the International Monetary Fund this week asked Spain to increase tax revenues to protect its public services and make further efforts to cut its budget deficit to ensure a lasting economic recovery.


The jobs package is due to be passed by the government next Friday and will include credit to small and medium-sized firms and an investments targeting research and development, energy-saving, transport and industrial production, Rajoy said at an event in Sitges in northern Spain that was broadcast on Spanish television.


Measures to fix the public employment service will also be put forward, he said.


Later in June, the government would approve a wide-ranging tax reform, he said, including a cut in the corporate tax rate although companies would enjoy fewer tax breaks.


“The general idea is to cut taxes. We want families to have more money in their hands, boost consumption, increase the competitiveness of the entire economy, step up savings and contribute to creating jobs,” Rajoy said.


The government already approved earlier this year a cut in social security contributions for companies creating jobs and Rajoy has said the reform would also include a cut in income tax for middle- and low-income taxpayers.


Spain’s government forecasts that the country’s ratio of public debt to gross domestic product (GDP) will reach 99.5 percent by the end of 2014, while the public deficit will remain high at 5.5 percent of GDP.


(Reporting by Julien Toyer; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)





Spain to pass $8.6 billion plan to boost jobs, cut taxes in June - prime minister

Demi Lovato Is The Most Adorable Tourist Ever



Just days after announcing her Demi: The World Tour dates, which kick off in September, Demi Lovato is playing a slightly different part: tourist.


Demi was photographed visiting the Tower of London while sporting the traditional bearskin hat of the Yeomen Warders aka “Beefeater” guards of the Tower.


Demi Lovato visits The Tower Of LondonSplash News


Clearly she can make just about any headgear look good, including a jeweled crown, which she took an obvious liking to once inside the Tower.


Unified Palestinian government to be announced Monday - Abbas



By Ali Sawafta


RAMALLAH West Bank (Reuters) – Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said on Saturday he expects a joint government of his Fatah party and Hamas Islamists will be announced on June 2, completing a unity deal the sides agreed last month.


Meeting with French peace activists in the West Bank city of Ramallah, where his limited self-rule government is based, Abbas said: “We will announce the government the day after tomorrow, it will be formed of technocrats and independents.”


None of the unity government’s members would belong to either the Western-backed Fatah, which rules the Israeli-occupied West Bank, or Islamist Hamas, which holds sway in the Gaza Strip, Abbas said.


Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said he could not confirm that all the details would be completed by Monday.


Both parties see benefits to a unity pact, though disagreements have blocked them from achieving such a government for years. The deal would heal a rift that opened between Fatah and Hamas in 2007 when Hamas seized control of Gaza.


Under a strict blockade imposed by neighbours Israel and Egypt, Hamas struggles to prop up Gaza’s economy and pay its 40,000 employees. Abbas, for his part, wants to shore up his domestic support since the collapse of U.S.-brokered peace talks with Israel last month. ISRAEL THREATENS BOYCOTT


Israel views Hamas as a terrorist organisation and suspended negotiations with Abbas as soon as he announced a unity deal was in the works on April 23. It has said it would impose economic sanctions against any joint government.


Abbas said Israel “informed us today they would boycott us if we announced the government.” He did elaborate on which measures Israel has threatened to take.


A Palestinian official said Israel had denied requests by three Gaza Palestinians expected to be named as ministers to attend the new govenrment’s swearing-in ceremony in the West Bank.


Israel withheld tax revenues from Abbas last month, in retaliation for Abbas signing accords with international organisations, a step Israel said undermined peace talks.


In his remarks on Saturday, Abbas said a joint government with Hamas would continue to abide by his policy of recognising Israel, though the Islamist group insists it would not change its own policy of rejecting Israel’s existence.


Abbas has been keen to assure Western donor countries he will remain the key Palestinian decision-maker and security coordination between his forces and Israel will continue.


Abbas asked Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah on Thursday to head the new unity government, though Fatah and Hamas still disagreed about other cabinet appointments.


In a move seen as boosting control over his party ahead of forming a unity government, Abbas ousted five senior party members on Saturday seen as allied with a leading rival, Mohammed Dahlan, the Palestinian news agency WAFA, said.


(Additional reporting by Nidal al-Mughrabi in Gaza; Writing by Allyn Fisher-Ilan; Editing by Robin Pomeroy)





Unified Palestinian government to be announced Monday - Abbas

Bahrain opposition to boycott election unless political deal reached



MANAMA (Reuters) – Bahrain‘s opposition parties will boycott parliamentary elections due to take place this year unless the government guarantees the vote will reflect the will of the people, a statement from the opposition said on Saturday.


Bahrain, a base for the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet, has been in turmoil since protests led by Shi’ite Muslims erupted in 2011 after similar uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia.


Talks between the government and opposition have failed to end the political standoff. Many Shi’ites complain of political and economic discrimination in the Sunni-ruled Gulf island state, a charge the authorities deny.


“The National Democratic Opposition Parties in Bahrain announced they are to boycott the coming Parliamentary elections unless a clear political agreement is reached,” said the statement issued after a meeting at the headquarters of al Wefaq, the main opposition movement.


“These elections must produce an elected government reflecting the will of the people, an independent judiciary and a security services that reflect Bahrain’s diversity.”


The groups urged the international community to help them pursue a peaceful democratic transition.


“The opposition will work on developing the peaceful popular struggle for democracy,” the statement said.


“We will stick to political activism that is based only on peaceful principles and continue to reject all and any violence.”


Bahrain, which effectively bans protests and gatherings not licensed by the government, has been caught up in a struggle for influence between Shi’ite Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia.


It quelled the 2011 revolt with help from Saudi Arabia and other Sunni-ruled Gulf states, but protests and small-scale clashes persist and bomb attacks have increased since mid-2012.


(Reporting by Farishta Saeed; Editing by Rosalind Russell)





Bahrain opposition to boycott election unless political deal reached

Warnings on 'gaming' patient waits go back years



WASHINGTON (AP) — The report this week confirming that 1,700 veterans were “at risk of being lost or forgotten” at a Phoenix hospital was hardly the first independent review that documented long wait times for some patients seeking health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs and inaccurate records that understated the depth of the problem.


Eleven years ago, a task force established by President George W. Bush determined that at least 236,000 veterans were waiting six months or more for a first appointment or an initial follow-up. The task force warned that more veterans were expected to enter the system and that the delays threatened the quality of care the VA provided.


Two years ago, a former hospital administrator told senators during an oversight hearing that VA hospitals were “gaming the system” and manipulating records to make it appear that wait time standards, the criteria for awarding manager and executive bonuses, were being met.


Since 2005, the department’s inspector general has issued 19 reports on how long veterans have to wait before getting appointments and treatment at VA medical facilities, concluding that for many, sufficient controls don’t exist to ensure that those needing care get it.


For example, in October 2007, the VA inspector general told the Senate Committee on Aging that “schedulers at some facilities were interpreting the guidance from their managers to reduce waiting times as instruction to never put patients on the electronic waiting list. This seems to have resulted in some ‘gaming’ of the scheduling process.”


That’s virtually identical to language in a 2010 VA memorandum, and again in the latest inspector general’s report this week that led dozens of members of Congress to call for VA Secretary Eric Shinseki to resign. He abided by those wishes Friday, telling Obama that he had become a distraction as the administration tried to address the VA’s troubles.


The series of reports over the years also raises questions about whether Congress should have done more to solve the problems that have so grabbed the nation’s attention in recent weeks.


“Anyone in Congress who thinks they’ve done enough for the VA is simply deluding themselves,” Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia said in response to Shinseki’s resignation. “Year after year, when members of Congress have had the opportunity to provide legitimate funding increases for the VA, they’ve done just enough to skirt by.”


Pointing to the Bush task force report from 2003, Joseph Violante, legislative director for Disabled American Veterans, said the problem of access to health care has been known for a decade.


“In our mind, a lot of the problem that is taking place on the health care side is due to a lack of sufficient funding, and that’s Congress’s jurisdiction. We think they’ve fallen short over the years,” Violante said.


Rep. Jeff Miller, the chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, said money is not the problem at the VA. He notes that the president has traveled the country touting the spending increases that have occurred in VA’s budget during his presidency.


Spending for VA medical care has nearly doubled in less than a decade, from $28.8 billion in 2006 to $56 billion last year.


“They can’t even spend the money that we appropriated to them. If money could have solved this problem, it would have been solved a long time ago,” Miller said. “It is manipulation and mismanagement that has created the crisis that exists today.”


Miller, who became chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs in 2011, makes the case that the investigations that have been undertaken by the VA’s inspector general and the Government Accountability Office were generally conducted at the request of members of Congress. When he has sought to follow up about whether the VA was meeting investigators’ recommendations, Miller said he has been stonewalled.


The committee has had an acrimonious relationship with VA leadership and even developed a section on its website called “Trials in Transparency” that list some of the more than 100 requests for information made by the committee that it says are still outstanding.


The problems in Phoenix, Miller said, came to light because of his committee’s work with a whistleblower that VA would not pay attention to, Dr. Samuel Foote, who retired after spending nearly 25 years with the department.


Foote said up to 40 veterans may have died while awaiting treatment at the Phoenix hospital and that staff, at the instruction of administrators, kept a secret list of patients waiting for appointments to hide delays in care. He believes administrators kept the off-the-books list to impress their bosses and get bonuses. The IG said that while its work was not complete, it had substantiated significant delays in access that negatively impacted the quality of care at the Phoenix hospital. The IG has not substantiated whether any veterans in Phoenix died due to a delay in treatment.


But it’s clear that media reports citing a specific number of 40 veteran deaths gave a human element to the story that triggered greater urgency from the public, veterans groups and lawmakers. In a matter of weeks the American Legion went from being a strong supporter of Shinseki to asking for his resignation.


“For some reason, something triggered the media’s appetite for this story when we’ve been asking VA to participate and give us information. I don’t know if it was the number of 40 veterans,” Miller said.


As he gave his final speech as VA secretary, Shinseki acknowledged that he once viewed the department’s problems concerning wait times as limited.


“I no longer believe it. It is systemic. I was too trusting of some, and I accepted, as accurate, reports that I now know to have been misleading with regard to patient wait times,” he said.





Warnings on 'gaming' patient waits go back years

Warnings on 'gaming' patient waits go back years



WASHINGTON (AP) — The report this week confirming that 1,700 veterans were “at risk of being lost or forgotten” at a Phoenix hospital was hardly the first independent review that documented long wait times for some patients seeking health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs and inaccurate records that understated the depth of the problem.


Eleven years ago, a task force established by President George W. Bush determined that at least 236,000 veterans were waiting six months or more for a first appointment or an initial follow-up. The task force warned that more veterans were expected to enter the system and that the delays threatened the quality of care the VA provided.


Two years ago, a former hospital administrator told senators during an oversight hearing that VA hospitals were “gaming the system” and manipulating records to make it appear that wait time standards, the criteria for awarding manager and executive bonuses, were being met.


Since 2005, the department’s inspector general has issued 19 reports on how long veterans have to wait before getting appointments and treatment at VA medical facilities, concluding that for many, sufficient controls don’t exist to ensure that those needing care get it.


For example, in October 2007, the VA inspector general told the Senate Committee on Aging that “schedulers at some facilities were interpreting the guidance from their managers to reduce waiting times as instruction to never put patients on the electronic waiting list. This seems to have resulted in some ‘gaming’ of the scheduling process.”


That’s virtually identical to language in a 2010 VA memorandum, and again in the latest inspector general’s report this week that led dozens of members of Congress to call for VA Secretary Eric Shinseki to resign. He abided by those wishes Friday, telling Obama that he had become a distraction as the administration tried to address the VA’s troubles.


The series of reports over the years also raises questions about whether Congress should have done more to solve the problems that have so grabbed the nation’s attention in recent weeks.


“Anyone in Congress who thinks they’ve done enough for the VA is simply deluding themselves,” Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia said in response to Shinseki’s resignation. “Year after year, when members of Congress have had the opportunity to provide legitimate funding increases for the VA, they’ve done just enough to skirt by.”


Pointing to the Bush task force report from 2003, Joseph Violante, legislative director for Disabled American Veterans, said the problem of access to health care has been known for a decade.


“In our mind, a lot of the problem that is taking place on the health care side is due to a lack of sufficient funding, and that’s Congress’s jurisdiction. We think they’ve fallen short over the years,” Violante said.


Rep. Jeff Miller, the chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, said money is not the problem at the VA. He notes that the president has traveled the country touting the spending increases that have occurred in VA’s budget during his presidency.


Spending for VA medical care has nearly doubled in less than a decade, from $28.8 billion in 2006 to $56 billion last year.


“They can’t even spend the money that we appropriated to them. If money could have solved this problem, it would have been solved a long time ago,” Miller said. “It is manipulation and mismanagement that has created the crisis that exists today.”


Miller, who became chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs in 2011, makes the case that the investigations that have been undertaken by the VA’s inspector general and the Government Accountability Office were generally conducted at the request of members of Congress. When he has sought to follow up about whether the VA was meeting investigators’ recommendations, Miller said he has been stonewalled.


The committee has had an acrimonious relationship with VA leadership and even developed a section on its website called “Trials in Transparency” that list some of the more than 100 requests for information made by the committee that it says are still outstanding.


The problems in Phoenix, Miller said, came to light because of his committee’s work with a whistleblower that VA would not pay attention to, Dr. Samuel Foote, who retired after spending nearly 25 years with the department.


Foote said up to 40 veterans may have died while awaiting treatment at the Phoenix hospital and that staff, at the instruction of administrators, kept a secret list of patients waiting for appointments to hide delays in care. He believes administrators kept the off-the-books list to impress their bosses and get bonuses. The IG said that while its work was not complete, it had substantiated significant delays in access that negatively impacted the quality of care at the Phoenix hospital. The IG has not substantiated whether any veterans in Phoenix died due to a delay in treatment.


But it’s clear that media reports citing a specific number of 40 veteran deaths gave a human element to the story that triggered greater urgency from the public, veterans groups and lawmakers. In a matter of weeks the American Legion went from being a strong supporter of Shinseki to asking for his resignation.


“For some reason, something triggered the media’s appetite for this story when we’ve been asking VA to participate and give us information. I don’t know if it was the number of 40 veterans,” Miller said.


As he gave his final speech as VA secretary, Shinseki acknowledged that he once viewed the department’s problems concerning wait times as limited.


“I no longer believe it. It is systemic. I was too trusting of some, and I accepted, as accurate, reports that I now know to have been misleading with regard to patient wait times,” he said.





Warnings on 'gaming' patient waits go back years

Three dead after car rally crashes



Three people were killed and six injured when cars collided with spectators in two different crashes at a motor rally.


The crashes happened within hours of each other at the Jim Clark Rally in the Scottish Borders.


Police said the most serious crash took place at about 4pm when a rally car came off the road near Kelso, hitting spectators.


Three were pronounced dead at the scene and a fourth is in a critical condition in Edinburgh Royal Infirmary.


Two hours earlier, a rally car hit five people.


Four were treated at the scene and another is in a serious condition in hospital.


Police Scotland said the the rally was cancelled after the fatal crash.




Source Article from https://uk.news.yahoo.com/two-feared-dead-car-rally-crash-185108079.html



Three dead after car rally crashes

Cameron says can't guarantee UK will stay in EU if Juncker gets top job - magazine



BERLIN (Reuters) – British Prime Minister David Cameron has warned he would no longer be able to guarantee that Britain would remain a member of the European Union if European leaders elect Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission chief, Germany’s Spiegel said.


The European Commission president is selected by EU leaders but must be approved by the assembly, where Eurosceptics from the right made gains in last week’s election. The European People’s Party, which won the most seats in the vote, had chosen Luxembourg’s ex-premier Juncker as their candidate.


In a pre-publication copy of an article, Spiegel said Cameron had explained, on the sidelines of an EU summit in Brussels on Tuesday, that if Juncker became Commission president, he would no longer be able to ensure Britain’s continued EU membership.


The magazine said participants understood Cameron’s comments on the sidelines of the meeting to mean that a majority vote for Juncker could destabilise his government to the extent that an “in-out” referendum would have to be brought forward.


That in turn, they understood, would most likely lead to the British people voting to quit the EU, it said.


The magazine said Cameron, who regards Juncker as too federalist and likely to damage his hopes of reforming Britain’s EU ties, dismissed the candidate during a recess with the words: “A face from the 80s can’t solve the problems of the next five years.”


A spokesman at the prime minister’s office declined to comment on the Spiegel article.


Cameron has promised to renegotiate the terms of Britain’s EU membership and if his Conservatives win a 2015 national election to hold a referendum by the end of 2017 on whether or not to remain in the EU.


On Monday he rejected calls to bring the referendum forward after his party was beaten into third place in European elections by the anti-EU UK Independence Party (UKIP) party.


(Reporting by Michelle Martin in Berlin and Costas Pitas in London)




Source Article from https://uk.news.yahoo.com/cameron-says-cant-guarantee-uk-stay-eu-juncker-181151465.html



Cameron says can't guarantee UK will stay in EU if Juncker gets top job - magazine

How Obama's power plant emission rules will work



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration on Monday plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.


The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.


Obama says the rules are essential to curb the heat-trapping greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. Critics contend the rules will kill jobs, drive up electricity prices and shutter plants across the country.


Environmentalists and industry advocates alike are eagerly awaiting the specifics, which the Environmental Protection Agency will make public for the first time on Monday and Obama will champion from the White House.


While the details remain murky, the administration says the rules will play a major role in achieving the pledge Obama made in Copenhagen during his first year in office to cut America’s carbon emissions by about 17 percent by 2020.


Some questions and answers about the proposal:


___


Q: How does the government plan to limit emissions?


A: Unable to persuade Congress to act on climate change, Obama is turning to the Clean Air Act. The 1970s-era law has long been used to regulate pollutants like soot, mercury and lead but has only recently been applied to greenhouse gases.


Unlike with new power plants, the government can’t regulate existing plant emissions directly. Instead, the government will issue guidelines for cutting emissions, then each state will develop its own plan to meet those guidelines. If a state refuses, the EPA can create its own plan.


___


Q: Why are these rules necessary?


A: Power plants are the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Environmentalists and the White House say without bold action, climate change will intensify and endanger the public’s well-being around the world. In its National Climate Assessment this year, the administration said warming and erratic weather will become increasingly disruptive unless curtailed.


“This is not some distant problem of the future. This is a problem that is affecting Americans right now,” Obama said in May.


The United States is only one player in the global climate game. These rules won’t touch carbon emissions in other nations whose coal plants are even dirtier. But the White House believes that leading by example gives the U.S. more leverage to pressure other countries to reduce their own emissions.


___


Q: How steep will the reductions be?


A: We don’t know.


The administration hasn’t said whether it will set one universal standard or apply different standards in each state. But Obama’s senior counselor, John Podesta, said the reductions will be made “in the most cost-effective and most efficient way possible,” by giving flexibility to the states.


That could include offsetting emissions by increasing the use of solar and nuclear power, switching to cleaner-burning fuels like natural gas or creating efficiency programs that reduce energy demand. States might also pursue an emissions-trading plan — also known as cap-and-trade — as several northeast states have already done.


___


Q: How will they affect my power bill? What about the economy?


A: It depends where you live. Different states have a different mixes of coal versus gas and other fuels, so the rules will affect some states more than others. Dozens of coal-burning plants have already announced they plan to close.


Still, it’s a good bet the rules will drive up electricity prices. The U.S. relies on coal for 40 percent of its electricity, and the Energy Department predicts retail power prices will rise this year because of environmental regulations, economic forces and other factors.


Environmentalists argue that some of those costs are offset by decreased health care costs and other indirect benefits. They also say the transition toward greener fuels could create jobs.


___


Q: Doesn’t Obama need approval from Congress?


A: Not for this. A 2007 Supreme Court ruling gave the EPA the green light to regulate carbon-dioxide under the Clean Air Act. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be fierce opposition and drawn-out litigation. The government is expecting legal challenges and is preparing to defend the rules in court if necessary.


___


Q: Is this the final step?


A: Not even close. After the draft rule is proposed, there’s a full year for public comment and revisions. Then states have another year to submit their implementation plans to the EPA.


___


Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.


___


Reach Josh Lederman at https://twitter.com/joshledermanAP





How Obama's power plant emission rules will work

How Obama's power plant emission rules will work



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration on Monday plans to make public the first rules limiting carbon emissions from the thousands of power plants.


The pollution controls form the cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s campaign to combat climate change and a key element of his legacy.


Obama says the rules are essential to curb the heat-trapping greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. Critics contend the rules will kill jobs, drive up electricity prices and shutter plants across the country.


Environmentalists and industry advocates alike are eagerly awaiting the specifics, which the Environmental Protection Agency will make public for the first time on Monday and Obama will champion from the White House.


While the details remain murky, the administration says the rules will play a major role in achieving the pledge Obama made in Copenhagen during his first year in office to cut America’s carbon emissions by about 17 percent by 2020.


Some questions and answers about the proposal:


___


Q: How does the government plan to limit emissions?


A: Unable to persuade Congress to act on climate change, Obama is turning to the Clean Air Act. The 1970s-era law has long been used to regulate pollutants like soot, mercury and lead but has only recently been applied to greenhouse gases.


Unlike with new power plants, the government can’t regulate existing plant emissions directly. Instead, the government will issue guidelines for cutting emissions, then each state will develop its own plan to meet those guidelines. If a state refuses, the EPA can create its own plan.


___


Q: Why are these rules necessary?


A: Power plants are the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. Environmentalists and the White House say without bold action, climate change will intensify and endanger the public’s well-being around the world. In its National Climate Assessment this year, the administration said warming and erratic weather will become increasingly disruptive unless curtailed.


“This is not some distant problem of the future. This is a problem that is affecting Americans right now,” Obama said in May.


The United States is only one player in the global climate game. These rules won’t touch carbon emissions in other nations whose coal plants are even dirtier. But the White House believes that leading by example gives the U.S. more leverage to pressure other countries to reduce their own emissions.


___


Q: How steep will the reductions be?


A: We don’t know.


The administration hasn’t said whether it will set one universal standard or apply different standards in each state. But Obama’s senior counselor, John Podesta, said the reductions will be made “in the most cost-effective and most efficient way possible,” by giving flexibility to the states.


That could include offsetting emissions by increasing the use of solar and nuclear power, switching to cleaner-burning fuels like natural gas or creating efficiency programs that reduce energy demand. States might also pursue an emissions-trading plan — also known as cap-and-trade — as several northeast states have already done.


___


Q: How will they affect my power bill? What about the economy?


A: It depends where you live. Different states have a different mixes of coal versus gas and other fuels, so the rules will affect some states more than others. Dozens of coal-burning plants have already announced they plan to close.


Still, it’s a good bet the rules will drive up electricity prices. The U.S. relies on coal for 40 percent of its electricity, and the Energy Department predicts retail power prices will rise this year because of environmental regulations, economic forces and other factors.


Environmentalists argue that some of those costs are offset by decreased health care costs and other indirect benefits. They also say the transition toward greener fuels could create jobs.


___


Q: Doesn’t Obama need approval from Congress?


A: Not for this. A 2007 Supreme Court ruling gave the EPA the green light to regulate carbon-dioxide under the Clean Air Act. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be fierce opposition and drawn-out litigation. The government is expecting legal challenges and is preparing to defend the rules in court if necessary.


___


Q: Is this the final step?


A: Not even close. After the draft rule is proposed, there’s a full year for public comment and revisions. Then states have another year to submit their implementation plans to the EPA.


___


Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.


___


Reach Josh Lederman at https://twitter.com/joshledermanAP





How Obama's power plant emission rules will work